guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: tbb: Update to 2017_20160722.


From: ng0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: tbb: Update to 2017_20160722.
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 15:10:41 +0000

Eric Bavier <address@hidden> writes:

> On 2016-09-09 04:51, ng0 wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/tbb.scm (tbb): Update to 2017_20160722.
>> ---
>>  gnu/packages/tbb.scm | 7 ++++---
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/tbb.scm b/gnu/packages/tbb.scm
>> index 0e9db72..22ce068 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/tbb.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/tbb.scm
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>  ;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
>>  ;;; Copyright © 2015 Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
>> +;;; Copyright © 2016 ng0 <address@hidden>
>>  ;;;
>>  ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
>>  ;;;
>> @@ -27,16 +28,16 @@
>>  (define-public tbb
>>    (package
>>      (name "tbb")
>> -    (version "4.3.2")
>> +    (version "2017_20160722")
>
> I think we should go with "2017" as the version; it seems to be what's 
> advertised.  This is their first release with the year-as-version, so we 
> don't know how they'd like to denote patch versions.

Okay

>>      (source (origin
>>                (method url-fetch)
>>                (uri (string-append
>>                      
>> "https://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/sites/default";
>>                      "/files/software_releases/source/"
>> -                    "tbb43_20141204oss_src.tgz"))
>> +                    "tbb" version "oss_src.tgz"))
>>                (sha256
>>                 (base32
>> -                
>> "0jsczl99jfgj47kj7c4sd4fk7v3rbaiax1ng9ypykz1hh0lrrsws"))
>> +                
>> "038rmv3s8si51bjrzwyv8ldqw742fjjdfayi8pmjaq5zw32b8pzx"))
>>                (modules '((guix build utils)))
>>                (snippet
>>                 '(substitute* "build/common.inc"
>
> The 2017 version also brings with it a change in license from GPLv2 with 
> libstdc++ runtime exception to the ASL2.0.  Could you include that in 
> this patch too?
>
> Thanks,
> -- 
> `~Eric
>

This is what I used in the mislead "Add tbb" patch I've sent
yesterday. It is now completely ASL2.0, or is it GPL2+ASL2.0? I've read
it yesterday as ASL only.
-- 
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]