Re: GnuTLS security update

[Ludovic Courtès]

Vincent Legoll <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Leo Famulari <address@hidden> wrote:
>> There is a GnuTLS security advisory [0] regarding "an issue that affects
>> validation of certificates using OCSP responses, which can falsely
>> report a certificate as valid under certain circumstances."
>>
>> I updated GnuTLS on core-updates to 3.5.4, the latest release of the 3.5
>> series.
>>
>> For master, the naive approach of cherry-picking the patch [1] did not
>> work; the test 'system-prio-file' fails consistently with that change. I
>> could instead try grafting the updated version.
>>
>> What do you think? The authors seem to think it's a relatively minor
>> issue [2], since exploiting it requires an attacker to compromise the
>> certificate authority.
>
> Side questions (just for my curiosity's sake):
>
> - What does it cost (manpower, hydra build time, etc...) approximatively
> to do a new release ?

Many packages would need to be rebuilt:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix refresh -l gnutls
Building the following 527 packages would ensure 1169 dependent packages are 
rebuilt:
[...]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> - Is it sufficiently automated ?

Yes:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix refresh gnutls
/home/ludo/.config/guix/latest/gnu/packages/tls.scm:140:13: gnutls would be 
upgraded from 3.5.2 to 3.5.4
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> - Can we help ?

Always!  ;-)

The question is such situations is just how to deploy the fix as fast as
possible, which means avoiding a situation that would lead users to
rebuild or redownload massive amounts of software just to get the
upgrade.  Grafts make it faster.

Ludo’.