Re: texmaker, Qt and Chromium

[Roel Janssen]

Ricardo Wurmus writes:

> David Craven <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> What do you think?  The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the
>>> other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt.
>>
>> Weren't you vocal on IRC about bundling and the hell it brings? Sounds
>> like bundling is ok when it suits you... :)
>
> I have no problems dropping Texmaker.  I’m not even using it.

Ouch.  I was the one who submitted the package when the Qt modules
weren't unbundled yet (I guess).  Now, because of a change of how we
package Qt, we're ready to remove a program that used to work just
fine..?

What's next?  Throw the calibre package out of the window too because
it's broken for GNU Guix users?

Kind regards,
Roel Janssen