[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Source tarballs from PyPI versus tarballs from the individual projec
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Source tarballs from PyPI versus tarballs from the individual project websites |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:44:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> skribis:
> I'd be for using actual upstream, or at least supplying both, so that
> they're mirrors. One concern is, what about the tooling for telling us
> when updates to packages are available?
‘guix refresh’ works for PyPI but not for arbitrary sites.
That would be in favor of using PyPI as the source, but I don’t know
what else is at stake.
Ludo’.