Re: python2-traceback2, python2-linecache2

[Hartmut Goebel]

Am 19.01.2017 um 15:34 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic:
> Maybe it works. However, I think it's silly to package a "traceback" module 
> for Python 3.5 which is a backport of the "traceback" module included in the 
> CPython 3.5 interpreter when we use the CPython 3.5 interpreter in the first 
> place.

Well, the root cause are badly written packages. We ought address this,
but it's not the primary packages job.

I'm in favour of keeping traceback2 and linecache2, since I'm afraid
there might be more package requiring them.

I already files some bug-reports to these projects:

https://github.com/testing-cabal/testtools/issues/246
https://github.com/testing-cabal/testtools/issues/247
https://github.com/testing-cabal/traceback2/issues/10
https://github.com/testing-cabal/linecache2/issues/13

-- 
Regards
Hartmut Goebel

| Hartmut Goebel          | address@hidden               |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |