[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: 16/35: gnu: r-ggplot2: Update to 2.2.0.

From: Ben Woodcroft
Subject: Re: Fwd: 16/35: gnu: r-ggplot2: Update to 2.2.0.
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 21:28:21 +1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1

On 23/01/17 18:57, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Ben Woodcroft <address@hidden> writes:

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        16/35: gnu: r-ggplot2: Update to 2.2.0.
Date:   Thu, 29 Dec 2016 20:49:25 +0000 (UTC)
From:   Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
Reply-To:       Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
To:     address@hidden

rekado pushed a commit to branch master
in repository guix.

commit ab01f1cdb11520f0d56249719bcf627cad802bc2
Author: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
Date:   Thu Dec 29 20:51:26 2016 +0100

      gnu: r-ggplot2: Update to 2.2.0.

      * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-ggplot2): Update to 2.2.0.
      [propagated-inputs]: Remove r-proto and r-svglite; add r-lazyeval and
Is there are particular reason why svglite was removed from propagated-inputs? In 
response I'm now unable to save SVG files with "ggsave", unless I install 
r-svglite separately.

Perhaps this is a consequence of the updater suggesting some inputs can be 
It is.  My apologies!

“r-svglite” is optional and was reported by my modified updater, which
compares the current inputs with the inputs a fresh import would
suggest.  If optional inputs are added it would be good to comment on
why they were added.  I probably wouldn’t have removed them in that

OK, np, pushed as e4b6c565beef27a1ce2203a9bc119e84a126e5e0.

I wonder if the importer could import the previous version again and compare to those, rather than just the current definition to avoid other situations like this.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]