[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnu-patches back log

From: John Darrington
Subject: Re: gnu-patches back log
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:14:34 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 08:17:39AM +0000, Pjotr Prins wrote:

     I would like to ask the Guix mailing list members whether it is
     *acceptable* that a good looking patch has not been touched for two
     weeks. Like this one
     Looks to me like it could go right in, even if it has no tests. And I
     bet it was linted. 
     I.e., LGTM, and apologies for the submitter. It is just embarrassing
     and as a project we can do better *together*. If two weeks is
     acceptable, will 4 weeks be acceptable? Where do we draw the line?

We already have a policy that if nobody comments on a patch the submitter
may commit it after two weeks.

Silence gives consent!

Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See or any PGP keyserver for public key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]