[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shouldn't docbook-xml/xsl set XML_CATALOG_FILES?

From: Hartmut Goebel
Subject: Shouldn't docbook-xml/xsl set XML_CATALOG_FILES?
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:28:36 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0


within a few day I stumbled twice over this: When using docbook-xml or
docbook-xsl in a package description, one needs to set XML_CATALOG_FILES
to make xslproc (and others) find the catalogs.

Shouldn't XML_CATALOG_FILES be defined as native-search-paths?

IMHO users expect (at least I do :-) the .xml and .xsl files to be
available aber installation of these packages without further action

BTW: For docbook-xsl the directory-name includes version, while for
docbook-xml it does not. Which one should be used?

Hartmut Goebel

| Hartmut Goebel          | address@hidden               |
| | compilers which you thought are impossible |

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]