[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building from a local source code checkout
From: |
Martin Castillo |
Subject: |
Re: Building from a local source code checkout |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2017 17:53:30 +0100 |
> I agree the matching-name constraint can be annoying. The alternative
> would be allow the user to (optionally?) specify the name of the package
> whose source is being changed, as in:
>
> guix build python-activepapers \
> --with-source=python-activepapers=$HOME/Dev/AP
>
> WDYT?
>
> A bit heavyweight syntactically but maybe we have to live with it.
>
> Ludo’.
>
Why can't guix use the argument package name argument?
v-- this one
guix build python-activepapers --with-source=$HOME/Dev/AP
Martin
--
GPG: 7FDE 7190 2F73 2C50 236E 403D CC13 48F1 E644 08EC
- Building from a local source code checkout, Konrad Hinsen, 2017/12/19
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/19
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Konrad Hinsen, 2017/12/20
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Konrad Hinsen, 2017/12/20
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/12/20
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Konrad Hinsen, 2017/12/21
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Pjotr Prins, 2017/12/21
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Martin Castillo, 2017/12/21
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/21
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout,
Martin Castillo <=
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/22
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Konrad Hinsen, 2017/12/21
- Re: Building from a local source code checkout, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/12/22