[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3
|
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
|
Subject: |
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:41:03 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hartmut Goebel <address@hidden> skribis:
> Am 13.03.2018 um 22:23 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> I may well have missed something (sorry about that!), but what are “the
>> problems related to how Guix is using PYTHONPATH”?
>
> In short:
>
> We are using PYTHONPATH for something it is not meant for: PYTHONPATH is
> NOT intended (by upstream) for adding site-packages. PYTHONPATH
> elements are added in front of essential packages, while site-packages
> are added behind.
Oh right, thanks for the reminder.
Ludo’.
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3, Hartmut Goebel, 2018/03/13
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/03/14
Re: PYTHONPATH issue explanation, Hartmut Goebel, 2018/03/15