[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packaging a free Firefox
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
Subject: |
Re: Packaging a free Firefox |
Date: |
Tue, 8 May 2018 10:36:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 06:30:44PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> All,
>
> I don’t think the harsh words are warranted. Clément reported that some
> of the add-ons that IceCat enables by default, which are there to
> improve user privacy and autonomy, can cause web sites to behave badly.
> Anyone can disable those add-ons, so I think we’re fine, aren’t we?
I don't think the words were meant to be harsh. We are all in this
together, right? Sorry if it came over that way.
> Also, Guix follows the FSDG as part of its mission, which I think isn’t
> news to anyone involved in the discussion, so it seems odd to question
> that.
I don't think that mission is questioned. No one expects Skype to be
part of Guix ;)
Pj.
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, (continued)
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Mike Gerwitz, 2018/05/06
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Pjotr Prins, 2018/05/06
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Hartmut Goebel, 2018/05/06
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Mike Gerwitz, 2018/05/06
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, jah, 2018/05/07
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/05/07
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox,
Pjotr Prins <=
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Mark H Weaver, 2018/05/07
- Re: Packaging a free Firefox, Mark H Weaver, 2018/05/07