[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bootstrap integration strategies
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: bootstrap integration strategies |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2018 21:52:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> My idea was to remove gcc, glibc and binutils from the x86 bootstrap
> binaries (possibly one at a time) and replace them by M1+Mes+Tcc-built
> ones. Possibly by adding an alternative %bootstrap-binaries package
> without them. Then build the x86 system on top of that. Then, or
> meanwhile, start thinking about x86_64 or AArch64.
I've been trying to cleanup the dependencies in wip-bootstrap. I found
that using `package-with-bootstrap-guile' confuses guix graph. Or so it
seems, many duplicates of those packages show up.
Here's an image created with this hack: replace
`package-with-bootstrap-guile' with `identity' in commencement.scm and
mes.scm
Where it says `bootstrap-binaries0', not that binutils, gcc, glibc are
not used.
Greetings,
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
- bootstrap integration strategies, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2018/07/09
- Re: bootstrap integration strategies, Orians, Jeremiah (DTMB), 2018/07/12
- Re: bootstrap integration strategies, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/07/12
- RE: bootstrap integration strategies, Orians, Jeremiah (DTMB), 2018/07/12
- Re: bootstrap integration strategies, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2018/07/12
- Re: bootstrap integration strategies,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: bootstrap integration strategies, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/07/13
- Re: bootstrap integration strategies, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2018/07/13
- Re: bootstrap integration strategies, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/07/13
- RE: bootstrap integration strategies, Orians, Jeremiah (DTMB), 2018/07/16
- Re: bootstrap integration strategies, Brett Gilio, 2018/07/16
Re: bootstrap integration strategies, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2018/07/12