[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium
From: |
Amirouche Boubekki |
Subject: |
Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 01:26:43 +0200 |
Le jeu. 30 août 2018 à 00:35, Clément Lassieur <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
> Hi Amirouche,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> Amirouche Boubekki <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Let's choose our battle wisely. I want to remind that the core of the
> > guix users are GNU followers and are also anything but pro web or pro
> > web browser or a variation of that. I don't say every GNU follower is
> > against the www. It's not the core of potential guix users
>
> Guix does not target GNU followers.
Good news.
> It targets all users. GNU
> followers are a very small part of them and they are not a problem
> because they usually find their way around.
Yes.
> The problem is all users
> that are not GNU followers (and some GNU followers like me) who need a
> modern browser.
Out of curiosity, please let us know what you need from the "modern browser"?
On my side, I need a debugger for doing web frontends.
> We definitely don't want to frighten them with our
> nostalgic ideas about how the web should be and how a browser should be.
I don't want to be rude at all, especially with who has been nice to me.
But following that kind of logic cannot always be a good way forward.
> They just want a browser that works. As long as it's free software,
> let's not complicate things for them.
I agree. I am wondering what that browser make it the browser they want.
> Otherwise we'll never grow.
Sorry again to disagree. I don't think the future of guix is in the desktop.
It has been said that GNU/Linux will kill windows on the desktop for a decade.
It did not happen. Nowadays, people use their computer only to run a browser
whatever the OS... Given that, It seems to defy the de facto
definition of a modern
OS not to provide a "good enough" web experience.
Snap!
>
> > 1) What firefox or chromium are useful for comparing to other graphical
> > web browsers?
> >
> > 2) What will chromium bring to guix and guix developers that they
> > can't do otherwise?
> >
> > 3) What are the minimal features for a graphical web browser to be
> > useful for a guix developer?
>
> Today I needed to browse some sites, at work, and I couldn't do it with
> anything else than Firefox and Chromium. I'm not alone. Lots of people
> need to browse complicated sites that they don't know in advance.
> We don't want them to wonder, every time: is it going to work with the
> browser shipped with Guix?
Agreed.
Ok. I will try to help with
a) chromium
b) investigate what people are expecting from a modern web browser
c) See whether qtwebkit is follows upstream security updates and test
it to see if it's stable
d) do the same with webkit-gtk
- Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Clément Lassieur, 2018/08/29
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/08/29
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Christopher Lemmer Webber, 2018/08/29
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Leo Famulari, 2018/08/29
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Amirouche Boubekki, 2018/08/29
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Mike Gerwitz, 2018/08/29
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Clément Lassieur, 2018/08/30
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/08/30
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Nils Gillmann, 2018/08/30
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Clément Lassieur, 2018/08/30
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/08/30
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Nils Gillmann, 2018/08/30
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Clément Lassieur, 2018/08/30
- Re: Firefox 52's end of life, packaging Chromium, Mike Gerwitz, 2018/08/30