[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Making javadoc reproducible
From: |
Chris Marusich |
Subject: |
Re: Making javadoc reproducible |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Oct 2018 20:35:19 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Gábor and Vagrant,
Vagrant Cascadian <address@hidden> writes:
> There's been some discussion about this in Debian and in reproducible
> builds:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/783938
>
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsInDocumentationGeneratedByJavadoc
>
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/issues/unstable/timestamps_in_documentation_generated_by_javadoc_issue.html
>
> Hope it's useful!
Thank you for the links!
Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> writes:
> Björn Höfling <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont:
> 2018. okt. 12., P, 20:01):
>>
>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:35:51 +0200
>> Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> > Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt.
>> > 12., P, 19:00):
>> > >
>> > > Hello guix,
>> > >
>> > > I've tracked down the javadoc timestamp problem.
>> > > There is a command line flag for javadoc (notimestamp), that
>> > > disables generating the comment in the docs that contains the
>> > > timestamp. Currently I see two ways forward:
>> > > 1. Track down the calls to javadoc, and add the flag to all calls.
>> > > 2. Write a simple patch to make javadoc behave as if notimestamp was
>> > > specified, whenever
>> > > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is defined.
>> > > I do not think, that the patch produced by 2 is upstreamable, but it
>> > > seems much less work. WDYT?
>> >
>> > Also we can simply turn off the timestamp generation
>> > unconditionally...
>>
>> Number 2 sounds good, and why not giving it a try to place it upstream?
>
> Ok, i will go for it, and try to get it upsreamed for jdk8 and jdk11.
Be sure to check out the links Vagrant posted. Specifically this one:
https://bugs.debian.org/783938
In that bug report, Samuel Thibault says: "Perhaps javadoc could be made
to use by default the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable when it is
defined?" There seems to be agreement that teaching javadoc to honor
the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable would be preferable to
unconditionally disabling the timestamp behavior.
--
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Making javadoc reproducible, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/12
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/12
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Björn Höfling, 2018/10/12
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/12
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Vagrant Cascadian, 2018/10/12
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Alex Vong, 2018/10/13
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible,
Chris Marusich <=
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/14
- Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/10/14
Re: Making javadoc reproducible, Danny Milosavljevic, 2018/10/15