Re: Guix & IPFS

[Pierre Neidhardt]

> I'm not much into go, but it seems, that most of the times it is safe
> to use another version of dependencies.

This is unrelated to Go: it's safe as long as there is no API breakage.  My
understanding of the IPFS project is that they don't want to make that kind of
assumptions.

> This seems to be orthogonal to the other issues mentioned here, and I believe 
> it
> should be implemented orthogonally (i.e. have it as an option to all,
> even unrelated packages).
> It would be great if integration with guix publish would be possible.

Absolutely.  Just to be clear, the reason I've mentioned both in the same thread
is because "gx" does both: managed versioned dependencies over IPFS.

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature