[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package variation
From: |
Brett Gilio |
Subject: |
Re: Package variation |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Oct 2018 01:01:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 |
Chris Marusich writes:
> Hi Brett,
>
> Brett Gilio <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> (define-public gnome-custom
>> (package (inherit gnome)
>> (name "gnome-custom")
>> (inputs (alist-delete "nautilus" (package-inputs gnome)))))
>
> The spirit of this is correct, but the implementation isn't quite
> right. The gnome package has no inputs:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,use (gnu packages gnome)
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,use (guix packages)
> scheme@(guile-user)> (package-inputs gnome)
> $1 = ()
>
> Instead, it has many propagated inputs. So, you should probably write:
>
> (define-public gnome-custom
> (package (inherit gnome)
> (name "gnome-custom")
> (propagated-inputs (alist-delete
> "nautilus"
> (package-propagated-inputs gnome)))))
>
> This will work as you expect. It's not incorrect to use alist-delete
> here, but FYI you can also use matching to do this as follows:
>
> (define-public gnome-custom
> (package (inherit gnome)
> (name "gnome-custom")
> (propagated-inputs (remove
> (match-lambda
> ;; Ignore the second value.
> ((name _)
> (string=? name "nautilus")))
> (package-propagated-inputs gnome)))))
>
> Whether or not you like that better probably depends on whether or not
> you view the value returned by (package-propagated-inputs gnome) as an
> alist or a list of 2-element lists.
>
>> (services (cons* (service gnome-desktop-service-type
>> config =>
>> (gnome-desktop-configuration
>> (inherit config)
>> (gnome-package gnome-custom)))
>> %desktop-services))
>
> It looks like you're using "config =>" from the modify-services syntax
> without actually using modify-services. Try this instead:
>
> (services (cons* (service gnome-desktop-service-type
> (gnome-desktop-configuration
> (inherit config)
> (gnome-package gnome-custom)))
> %desktop-services))
>
> This should create and add a gnome-desktop-service-type service instance
> with the configuration you've specified.
>
> Hope that helps!
Hi chris! Thank you for your feedback, and your insight. I appreciate it
greatly. I have applied your changes (Both variations) and neither one
seems to be working and nautilus remains on the system. I am honestly at
a loss of what is wrong with the approach.
Re: Package variation, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/10/24