Re: [outreachy] Further steps

[Laura Lazzati]

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:37 AM Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hello Laura,
>
> Laura Lazzati <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2018.
> okt. 25., Cs, 16:17):
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 12:08 AM Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Laura,
> > >
> > > >> > If you have any other favourite packages, you can give them also a 
> > > >> > try.
> > > >> > It could just get more difficult, with more manual steps, other build
> > > >> > systems, dependencies to be packed first, code to be patched, etc.
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, this would also be good. Please tell us if you have any specific 
> > > >> package
> > > >> in mind.
> > > > I guess I could package some more R packages, and then let me know
> > > > which ones you think are more convenient, or you find more appealing
> > > > for Guix.
> > >
> > > All free R packages on CRAN are appealing from my perspective.  You can
> > > also pick a package from Bioconductor, which might be a tad more
> > > difficult, as that could depend not only on other Bioconductor packages
> > > but also packages on CRAN.  Note that the importer does not
> > > automatically switch between downloading from Bioconductor to
> > > downloading from CRAN, so you may have to run the importer more than
> > > once.
> > >
> > > Use “guix import cran -a bioconductor -r PACKAGE” — when it aborts you
> > > may have stumbled upon an unpackaged CRAN package.
> > >
> > > R packages from Bioconductor should be added to the (gnu packages
> > > bioconductor) module.
> > >
> > Yes, I was thinking that maybe a trade-off between learning new things
> > and contributing with things that you need right now, that was why I
> > was thinking of R packages. Maybe I could package one or two more, to
> > practice doing so by myself this time, and then switch to another
> > task, WDYT?
>
> That would be great!
Ok then, I start with a new R package, and then send the patch.
>
> > BTW, I was trying to run guix pull, the one installed on top of my
> > foreing distro - not the one in the guix environment - and I am
> > getting this error, don't know why, I have already run guix pull
> > before:
> > :~/guix$ guix pull
> > Migrating profile generations to '/var/guix/profiles/per-user/laura'...
> > guix pull: error: symlink: File exists:
> > "/var/guix/profiles/per-user/laura/current-guix-1-link"
>
> It seems that something is mixed up between the old and new guix pull,
> I hope someone can provide some more insight. Ludo?
Yes please, I need to fix this before going on.
Here is what happened, so that I provide the full information
After having my patch approved, I ran git pull (on master branch, of
course, I then created branches)
I wanted to check that everything was fine, so I ran:
:~/guix$ guix package -s "^r" | recsel -p name description| grep '\S'
| sort >newR.txt
And got the output:
Command 'recsel' not found, but can be installed with:
sudo apt install recutils
(which is strange, I have played with recsel before sending my
patches, when learning guix package command)
so i ran guix package -I, where recutils was effectively installed
However, I tried:
$guix package -i recutils
guix package: warning: Your Guix installation is 13 days old.
guix package: warning: Consider running 'guix pull' followed by
'guix package -u' to get up-to-date packages and security updates.
The package was installed after those warnings, and I was asked to
export env variables:
export PATH="/home/laura/.guix-profile/bin${PATH:+:}$PATH"
export INFOPATH="/home/laura/.guix-profile/share/info${INFOPATH:+:}$INFOPATH"
Did so, but when running again:
:~/guix$ guix package -s "^r" | recsel -p name description| grep '\S'
| sort >newR.txt
Got the output:
recsel: error: cannot read file description
And also got that error when running guix pull.
>
> > > As far as learning new things goes: R packages usually are very simple
> > > They rarely ever require changes to the build system, so you don’t get
> > > to learn about the “arguments” field of the “package” DSL.
> > >
> > > Alternatively, you could look into making changes to the Texinfo
> > > documentation.  For the project you would need to be somewhat familiar
> > > with the manual, so it can’t hurt if you would edit it a little.  An
> > > easy edit is to add a handful of address@hidden lines to places in the 
> > > manual
> > > that currently miss them.  A address@hidden line adds a location in the
> > > manual to the index for a given keyword, so that people can find
> > > relevant places in the manual more easily.
> > By the manual you, mean,
> > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/index.html#Top,
> > or am I missing something?
>
> There is the manual in the source tree, at doc/guix.texi.
> The one on the website is generated from that.
>
> > If that's the manual, please, let me know further steps to edit it,
> > since I don't have much idea of how to do so.
>
> You can modify the manual at doc/guix.texi, and send a patch
> the same way you would do for adding a package. Please note,
> that info is sometimes quite fussy about format, so try to rebuild
> the manual after modifications.
>
> > It also mentions that you need help for translations, my mother tongue
> > is spanish, and I am good at translating documentation, at least in
> > neutral latin american spanish, but I don't know if that is for
> > another project - I followed the link: Translation Project.
> >
>
> You are welcome to help with translations if you can find the time for that.
> Translation Project is a hub, where different projects can send there po files
> for translation. Usually there are language communities for a given language,
> and they are coordinating translation work. This is orthogonal to this 
> Outreachy
> project.
>
> However, it would be nice if you could provide the translations of the videos,
> once we get there,
>
> > Regards!
> > Laura
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ricardo
> > >
>
> Best regards,
> g_bor