[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?
From: |
HiPhish |
Subject: |
Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Oct 2018 01:38:42 +0100 |
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 00:54:54 CET you wrote:>
> You, me, Alex and the rest of Guix share a culture. I'm assuming that is the
> culture Alex refers to, not the cultures of our distinct offline locale.
What culture am I sharing with you? I am not a hacker, I only care about code
quality, just as only care about the plumbing of my toilet and not plumber
culture. I also care about software Freedom because I have been bitten in the
behind often enough by proprietary software to know that it is wrong. I care
about Guix because functional package management is the only sane way of
package management. What is the alternative to Guix? Flatpak and other opaque
systems suitable for bundling proprietary software?
> Also, the burden of proof really is with HiPhish. Harassment in tech, and
> FLOSS especially has been well documented. See for example:
> http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/FLOSS
> https://lwn.net/Articles/417952/
> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/06/05/open_source_developer_survey_2017/
> for a start.
I asked for proof, not "she said, he said". Except this is just "she said".
What if that "groping" as some guy brushing at her butt in a crowd by
accident? I have a really hard time believing that there is an epidemic of
serial gropers at tech conferences. Does that mean no one gets groped? Of
course not, even I had my butt slapped in the past by girls, but so what?
Here is a question for you: why are you taking these reports for granted? Do
you not consider the possibility that isolated issues are being blown out of
proportion by malicious agents? The incidents don't even have to be fake, the
offender might be a malicious agent as well. Free and Open Source projects are
a problem for proprietary software companies and any means to disrupt the
projects is acceptable. Why do you think the CC is so focused on punishment
and not healing?
Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?, Alex Sassmannshausen, 2018/10/29
Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?, Alex Sassmannshausen, 2018/10/31
Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?, HiPhish, 2018/10/31
Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?, Alex Sassmannshausen, 2018/10/31
Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?, HiPhish, 2018/10/31
Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?, Jelle Licht, 2018/10/31
Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?, HiPhish, 2018/10/31
Stop it. Formerly - Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?, Pjotr Prins, 2018/10/31
Re: Stop it. Formerly - Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?, Leo Famulari, 2018/10/31
Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?, HiPhish, 2018/10/31