[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?
|
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
|
Subject: |
Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 06 Nov 2018 13:03:41 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 |
Also, if we move to go 1.11, should we remove go 1.9? Considering there is the
slowdown mentioned in https://bugs.gnu.org/32919, maybe it would be smarter to
keep 1.9 around?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07