[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?

From: Ricardo Wurmus
Subject: Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 04:44:25 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1

zimoun <address@hidden> writes:

> I am not sure to understand what is the rule to attribute a package to
> bioinformatics.scm or to bioconductor.scm when it comes from
> Bioconductor.

bioinformatics.scm was there first.  Later I added bioconductor.scm
because I didn’t want bioinformatics.scm to eventually be full of R

New Bioconductor packages should go to bioconductor.scm.  Eventually we
may move all remaining R packages from bioinformatics to

> Last, there is not alphabetical order of the packages in the files.
> How the order is determined ?

Whichever package is added first comes first, later packages are usually
added to the bottom of the file.  The order has no significance.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]