[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re-approaching package tagging
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Re-approaching package tagging |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2018 21:46:19 +0100 |
Hi,
Wow! Thank you! :-)
And how the regexp works ?
I am not able to find some doc... I am diving in the code but it is
not easy to find. :-)
Well, is regexp a real regular expression?
For example, how to search package with the name emacs and not the name emacs-*?
or how to search package with the name emacs and with the decription GNU?
The '-s foo -s bar' is OR. What about the AND?
etc.
Thank you in advance for any pointer.
All the best,
simon
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, (continued)
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/18
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Christopher Lemmer Webber, 2018/12/18
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, zimoun, 2018/12/18
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/19
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging,
zimoun <=
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, zimoun, 2018/12/19
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/20
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Chris Marusich, 2018/12/20
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/21
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Christopher Lemmer Webber, 2018/12/20
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, swedebugia, 2018/12/20
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/21
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/19
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, zimoun, 2018/12/19
- Re: Re-approaching package tagging, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/12/20