Re: Merging staging?

[Efraim Flashner]

On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 04:00:48PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 03:58:09PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> > Hi Guix,
> > 
> > I'd like to get staging merged soon, as it wasn't for quite some time. Here
> > are some stats about the current state of substitutes for staging:
> > 
> > According to guix weather, we have:
> > 
> > | architecture | berlin | hydra |
> > +--------------+--------+-------+
> > | x86_64       | 36.5%  | 81.7% |
> > | i686         | 23.8%  | 71.0% |
> > | aarch64      | 22.2%  | 00.0% |
> > | armhf        | 17.0%  | 45.6% |
> > 
> > What should the next step be?
> > 
> 

I merged master into staging today and got the following chart:

| architecture | berlin | hydra |
+--------------+--------+-------+
| x86_64       | 42.2%  | 78.8% |
| i686         | 28.2%  | 64.3% |
| aarch64      | 0%     | 23.0% |
| armhf        | 16.8%  | 50.4% |

but compared to master:

| architecture | berlin | hydra |
+--------------+--------+-------+
| x86_64       | 57.5%  | 91.9% |
| i686         | 44.4%  | 77.8% |
| aarch64      | 0%     | 41.8% |
| armhf        | 30.3%  | 69.6% |

So I think I'd like to see a comparison on hydra of staging vs master
and if it's good enough we go ahead and merge


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature