[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Naming, hacking, and policies

From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: Naming, hacking, and policies
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 18:33:55 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
>>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:02:00PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>>>> I still think this change should be reverted
>>> I also think so.
>> I’d also be in favor of reverting.
> I’m also in favour.  A pure revert would not be enough, though, would
> it?  The new names would need to remain as deprecated names (I know of
> at least one person who installed some of these games under the long
> names).

Indeed.  So I reverted one in commit
e23f2ff1836e982fc2289093aab0994e0c0cf2d2 (this particular rename broke a
unit test.)  As you can see in this commit, it’s mostly a matter of
swapping the package names between the deprecated and the non-deprecated

Any takers?  Thoughts?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]