[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions
From: |
Thomas Schmitt |
Subject: |
Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Apr 2019 18:24:00 +0200 |
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I don’t feel like distributing two variants of the ISO per architecture.
Then i guess the most early opportunity for my proposal to get
into production is after the upcomming Guix release.
> It’s also something other distros don’t do: you get only one
> ISO per architecture.
Not really. :))
Debian offers a wide range of sizes from mini.iso (32 MB) to BDDL (50 GB)
and two flavors for x86: Installer and Live (with several desktop flavors).
I have to acknowledge, though, that their boot equipment at most differs by
lagging behind debian-cd evolution.
If it's about what other distros do: They do MBR partition table.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, (continued)
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/04/25
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/04/26
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/04/26
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/04/26
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/04/26
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/04/27
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions,
Thomas Schmitt <=
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/04/28
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/04/25
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/04/25
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2019/04/25
- Re: ISO installer image: GPT versus MBR partitions, Thomas Schmitt, 2019/04/25