[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guix pack -f docker and name ?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: guix pack -f docker and name ? |
Date: |
Tue, 21 May 2019 10:52:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) |
Howdy!
zimoun <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 17:42, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
>> I think ‘guix pack’ should have a ‘-r/--root’ option like ‘guix build’
>> so you can do:
>>
>> guix pack -r my-image -f docker foo bar baz
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> Yes, it better fits what I am more or less doing by hand.
> Nice `guix pack` owns this option.
Cool. Note that the advantage is the GC root, but if it’s just about
creating a symlink, you can also do:
ln -s $(guix pack -f docker whatever) my-symlink
>> > 2.
>> > Once loaded with `docker load < /gnu/store/<hash>-docker-pack.tar`
>> > then `docker image ls` list all the images. The REPOSITORY and TAG are
>> > not super helpful. :-)
>> > It is always: profile and <hash>.
>> >
>> > Maybe REPOSITORY should be guix and TAG should be <short-hash>-<name>.
>> > Because when one has more than 2 images, after holidays it is not
>> > possible to remember or they needs to track in a separate file what it
>> > is.
>>
>> I agree, we can do better here. :-)
>>
>> We could allow for user-provided names, and/or, when ‘--save-provenance’
>> is used, we could show the commit ID or something.
>>
>> Ideas?
>
> I was proposing:
> guix pack -f docker -r foo
> generates the file:
> /gnu/store/<long-hash>-docker-pack.tar
> where the symlink foo to this file and the field REPOSITORY should be
> guix and the field TAG should `foo-<short-hash>` where <short-hash>`
> is let say 6 characters.
OK.
> I do not know if it is the right way. What do people using Docker think ?
Yup, I’m curious what people think best practice is! Because I don’t
really qualify as a “Docker user” myself. :-)
Thank you,
Ludo’.