Re: packaging postgrest, haskell patches

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Timothy Sample <address@hidden> writes:

>> I think we should get input from Timothy, Ricardo, and anyone with an
>> interest in Haskell packaging.  But I think you’re a good candidate for
>> the honorific position of Haskell Package Overseer.  :-)
>
> Since their first contribution I’ve thinking to myself “I hope Robert
> sticks around long enough to become the Haskell Package Overseer.”  :)

Hah, me too :)

> To be honest, I don’t use the current categorization system for Haskell
> or for anything, really.  I just search.
[…]
> My (slight) preference is just to copy Python, including getting rid of
> “haskell-apps” (unless it is a necessary hack), and splitting off
> “haskell-xyz” from “haskell”.

Same here.

-- 
Ricardo