[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix
From: |
Jan |
Subject: |
Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Oct 2019 00:37:19 +0200 |
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 22:52:58 +0200
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:
> We always try to unbundle libraries, because that ensures that all
> packages benefit from security fixes.
>
Great, so I have to package everything recursively :)
Just to make it clear, because I'm a bit unfamiliar with build systems
and the package API - will packing every library pjproject uses and
just adding it in the "inputs" field make building possible, or will I
have to do magic and copy built packages into "third_party" folder in
the pjproject source tree?
Also what if pjproject (or any package I want to update) depends on a
specific version of a library? Should I just update the package, or
should I add a separate version of the library?
Jan Wielkiewicz
- Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix, Jan, 2019/10/18
- Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix, Marius Bakke, 2019/10/18
- Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/10/20
- Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/10/25
- Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix, Jan Wielkiewicz, 2019/10/25
- Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/10/26
- Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix, Jan Wielkiewicz, 2019/10/27
- Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/10/28
Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix, Jan Wielkiewicz, 2019/10/27