Re: Guix and FSDG

[Thompson, David]

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 2:20 PM Raghav Gururajan
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I completely agree with you. The way you explained, does show that Guix
> comply with FSDG. The thing is, the semantics used in current version
> of FSDG does not explain things well. That's why I pointed out that
> FSDG require revision, such that this new scenario is included in FSDG.
> So that Guix or any future distros that gonna use same/similar
> mechanism, does not pose confusion to readers of FSDG. That is all. :-)

Glad that we're in agreement. :)

- Dave