[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0? |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Dec 2019 15:40:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 |
zimoun <address@hidden> writes:
> This fix -- reuse all the free available code and replace the non-free
> one -- do not scale.
> So the question is: What is the scale we are talking about? How many
> packages in Bioconductor?
> If it is, say, a couple then it is doable. Or see with the people
> managing Bioconductor.
> If it is more, then the option is lobbying. :-)
In my experience tt happens rarely enough that it appears to scale just
fine. Every time it happens is a drag, of course, but only a small
percentage of CRAN and Bioconductor packages suffers from problems like
that. That’s still an estimated dozens of packages, but it’s not quite
as bad as it may seem.
--
Ricardo
- Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, (continued)
Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2019/12/19
Guix and Bioconductor., Giovanni Biscuolo, 2019/12/20
Re: Guix and Bioconductor., Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/12/20
[OT] Re: Guix and Bioconductor., Giovanni Biscuolo, 2019/12/21
Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?, zimoun, 2019/12/19