Re: Packaging Jami progress

[Jan]

On Fri, 03 Jan 2020 07:33:38 +0100
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:

> That’s very unlikely as we would probably see errors like this in most
> packages then.
> 
> cogl issues an optimized instruction (__memcpy_ssse3), which then
> fails.
> 
> I’m just guessing, but I wonder if this comment is a hint at what’s
> wrong here:
> 
>     ;; NOTE: mutter exports a bundled fork of cogl, so when making
> changes to ;; cogl, corresponding changes may be appropriate in
> mutter as well.
> 
> cogl is up to date, but mutter is not (it’s tied to the current Gnome
> version in Guix, which is a few releases behind).
> 
> It may also be interesting to see if this can be reproduced on
> Wayland.
> 
> --
> Ricardo
> 

I'll check it on wayland then. Anyway the bug is also present in our
current version, can I send paches containing my current changes then?


Jan Wielkiewicz