Re: Speeding up “guix pull”: splitting modules

[zimoun]

Hi Ricardo,

On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 21:38, Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:

> Gábor once suggested an iterative approach of identifying the most
> important nodes in the package graph that should be moved to their own
> modules, so that we would end up with a package graph that looks less
> like a hair ball.  I think it would useful to get a better view on the
> relationships between modules.

I am not sure to correctly understand. What does it mean "the most
important nodes in the package graph"?
Does "important node" mean a package which appears as inputs in a lot
of other packages?


Cheers,
simon