[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package file indexing
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Package file indexing |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:21:10 +0100 |
Christopher Baines <address@hidden> writes:
> Not specifically, it just becomes more complex as you have to consider
> more issues. Like the mundane "what if one user is using a file, and
> another deletes it" to the more unusual "what if you can modify the file
> to crash or exploit processes run by other users".
What I have in mind is that only the daemon could update the database.
Regarding the concurrency issue, a mutex should do it I think.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Package file indexing, (continued)
- Re: Package file indexing, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/09
- Re: Package file indexing, Christopher Baines, 2020/01/09
- Re: Package file indexing, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/10
- Re: Package file indexing, Christopher Baines, 2020/01/10
- Re: Package file indexing, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/11
- Re: Package file indexing, Christopher Baines, 2020/01/12
- Re: Package file indexing, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/13
- Re: Package file indexing, Christopher Baines, 2020/01/13
- Re: Package file indexing, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/13
- Re: Package file indexing, Christopher Baines, 2020/01/13
- Re: Package file indexing,
Pierre Neidhardt <=
Re: Package file indexing, zimoun, 2020/01/02
- Re: Package file indexing, raingloom, 2020/01/03
- Re: Package file indexing, zimoun, 2020/01/06
- Re: Package file indexing, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/09
- Re: Package file indexing, zimoun, 2020/01/09
- Re: Package file indexing, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/09
- Re: Package file indexing, zimoun, 2020/01/09
- Re: Package file indexing, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/09
- Re: Package file indexing, zimoun, 2020/01/09
Re: Package file indexing, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/09