[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parameterized packages
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Parameterized packages |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:34:48 +0100 |
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 12:51, Pierre Neidhardt <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> zimoun <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Maybe I misread. :-)
> > I am still convinced that it is not the correct design and instead be
> > able to partially override the package definition seems more
> > appropriate.
>
> If you have another design in mind that supports parameter composition, please
> do share :)
Héhé, you are kidding, right? :-)
Maybe improving how to override a package... :-D
Maybe something similar to Nix... which claims composition. ;-)
https://nixos.org/nixos/nix-pills/override-design-pattern.html
https://nixos.org/nixos/nix-pills/nixpkgs-overriding-packages.html
Anyway.
I should misunderstand something and should miss a key point.
You could explain me IRL at Guix Days in the front of the beer you owe me. ;-)
Cheers,
simon
- Re: Parameterized packages, (continued)
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/21
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/22
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/22
- Re: Parameterized packages, ison, 2020/01/24
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/26
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages,
zimoun <=
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, John Soo, 2020/01/25
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/20
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/15
Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/15