[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packaging pjproject
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
Re: Packaging pjproject |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Feb 2020 20:42:49 +0200 |
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Jan Wielkiewicz wrote:
> Dnia 2020-01-31, o godz. 18:12:07
> Pierre Neidhardt <address@hidden> napisał(a):
>
> > To be more specific, I have never touched pjproject.
> Sorry, didn't know that.
> > I was the 4th person so work on the Jami patch and I fixed pjproject-jami.
> > I sadly have no experience with pjproject beyond that.
> Now thats scary :D
> pjproject is a ghost package.
>
> I can try nagging people on pjproject mailing list, but don't know, if
> I'm up to the task. What should I ask them? "How to build pjproject
> without running make dep" or "Can I build pjproject using system
> libraries"? Should I learn more about build systems to be able to fix
> this, or is it implementation-dependent? My experience with packaging
> so far tells me there is no standard for build systems and every
> package is different.
Debian does a lot of work with unbundling software, I'd check with them
first if they've patched anything to make it work.
--
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Packaging pjproject,
Efraim Flashner <=