[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: February update on data.guix.gnu.org and the Guix Data Service
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: February update on data.guix.gnu.org and the Guix Data Service |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:31:11 +0100 |
Christopher Baines <address@hidden> writes:
> I forget exactly when, but recently I've been trying to revive the patch
> review setup I was working on around a year ago [6]. I've setup an
> instance of the Guix Data Service for this [7] (separate to the
> data.guix.gnu.org one). I might try and have that instance of the Guix
> Data Service process all the branches in the Guix git repository, now
> that data.guix.gnu.org doesn't do that.
>
> 6: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2019-02/msg00089.html
> 7: https://guix-patches-data.cbaines.net/
This is great!
So how do we use it?
I tried clicking on series-2472, then "Latest processed revision", then
"View cgit".
Is it how it's supposed to be done?
I'm guessing the "series-N" naming is temporary, as it would be nice to
have commit / email title instead. What does the number refer to?
Side question: I'd like to know if some package substitute is available,
say MAME:
http://data.guix.gnu.org/repository/1/branch/master/package/mame
If go to
http://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/3dd311e3a059131ef245417106d4fb659222ef3c/package/mame/0.218
I see it is scheduled. If I click on "Scheduled" I end up here:
http://data.guix.gnu.org/build-server/1/build?derivation_file_name=/gnu/store/7aqmbfjwm0hiy1kviijj7fc9wqp71mnw-mame-0.218.drv
There is a timestamp: 2020-02-05T21:59:55
Does this mean it's been 13 days since the schedule? That's odd.
Back to the
http://data.guix.gnu.org/repository/1/branch/master/package/mame page, I
don't really understand what the first version means. If I click on the
latest date, I end up here:
http://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/3dd311e3a059131ef245417106d4fb659222ef3c
This is Guix, not MAME, right? I wonder why we display this here, I
find it a bit confusing. I think the version table should explicitly
mention that this is the Guix revision, not that of the package
(assuming I understood correctly).
Anyways, as usual thanks for the fantastic job!
Cheers!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature