[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plan for a release!
From: |
Joshua Branson |
Subject: |
Re: Plan for a release! |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:47:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Guix!
>
> I’m going on vacation for a bit, but I think we should finally get that
> release out! Here’s the list of things to do I have in mind:
>
> • We need Guile 3.0.1 to fix ‘guix pull’ etc. on AArch64 and possibly
> JIT on ARMv7:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39266
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39208
>
> • More testing of the guided installer and related issues:
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39729
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39712
I'll volunteer to do this on Thursday. I've got two Macbooks 7,1 and a
2008 Macbook Pro that I can test on.
>
> • Fix the weird default font in GNOME Terminal, as sirgazil reported
> on help-guix.
>
> • Ensure that the desktop environments provided by the installer
> actually work (GNOME, Xfce, MATE, etc.). It’d be great to have
> automated tests for these!
I do that as well this Thursday.
>
> • (Optionally) have an automated test that installs the binary tarball
> on Debian or similar.
>
> • Address as many of the bugs marked “important” or “serious” as
> possible. Should we organize a bug-squashing week? :-)
>
> • We already have “make assert-binaries-available”, but at the Guix
> Days we came up with the idea of having ‘guix weather
> --release-critical’ or similar, which would ensure that all the
> relevant jobs pass (packages, cross-builds, system tests, etc.).
> I’ll see if I can do something in that area.
>
> What’s missing from the list?
>
> I don’t think we’ll wait for the ‘core-updates’ merge, but who knows.
>
> As you see there’s a lot of testing in there, plus the need to keep
> things on track! If someone wants to be the “master of time” and make
> sure we don’t enter and endless add-feature/break/fix loop, that’d be
> welcome!
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ludo’.
>
--
Joshua Branson
Sent from Emacs and Gnus