[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reducing LLVM closure size
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Reducing LLVM closure size |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:41:53 +0200 |
Hi!
Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Nice! I looked for something like this when I packaged
>> ‘clang-tools-extra’ and didn’t find it. This should go into the next
>> ‘staging’ branch (or ‘core-updates’?).
>
> I can send a patch for llvm-10, but I guess many llvm-dependents will
> have to be updated accordingly.
>
> I suppose that the input
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ("llvm" ,llvm)
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> will need to be turned to
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ("llvm" ,llvm "lib")
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> for most packages. I have no experience with LLVM, so can someone
> confirm that this is the right way to go?
Friendly ping :)
Should I send a patch?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, (continued)
Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Arun Isaac, 2020/06/13
Re: Reducing LLVM closure size, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/06/16