[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?) |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:51:27 +0200 |
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 10:42, Giovanni Biscuolo <g@xelera.eu> wrote:
> Please consider I'm still on Emacs 26.3 since one package I use does not
> work with 27.1... and I still have not tested "the bug" in a pure
> anvironmentt with emacs 27.1 only
Ouch! Which one is it?
> I'm affected by that bug every time I do:
>
> 1. on machine A: start emacs --daemon
> 2. on machine B: ssh -Y me@A
> 3. on machine B: emacsclient -c (in ssh session)
Sorry, I miss where this emacsclient is started? A or B?
If you start emacsclient on B and try to connect over SSH to the
server on A, which option do you provide? (naive question because I
have always failed to do that :-))
Personally, I have 2 uses cases:
i.
machine A: emacs --daemon
machine B: ssh -C me@A -t emacsclient -t
and I never do "ssh -CX me@A -t emacsclient -c" because the network is
usually too slow to export DISPLAY; machines A and B are usually a bit
far in my cases.
ii.
machine B: start emacs --daemon
machine B: emacsclient -c
machine B: open via TRAMP over ssh on A
And Tramp crashes time to time.
> AFAIU this bug is still affecting other Emacs users using GTK as X
> toolkit.
Yeah, for sure. And as you noted too, it is difficult to know what is
the exact status of this bug. :-)
All the best,
simon
- Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?, (continued)
- Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/22
- emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/24
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/24
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?),
zimoun <=
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Mark H Weaver, 2020/09/26
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/26
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Mark H Weaver, 2020/09/26
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/27
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/27
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Bonface M. K., 2020/09/27
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Bonface M. K., 2020/09/28
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/28