[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2020 16:58:13 +0200 |
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 10:57, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:
> Of course, `guix filesearch` hasn't been implemented yet ;)
Sorry, I have overlooked the status. :-)
> We still need to decide whether we want to make it part of `guix search'
> or define a separate command.
>From my point of view, it would be better to include it under “guix
search”. Even, from my point of view, the code about “search” in “guix
package” should go in “guix search”. Well do the opposite of the
current: “guix package –search” becoming an alias of “guix search” in
term of code. Anyway. :-)
Cheers,
simon
- Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/10/05
- Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/05
- Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers, zimoun, 2020/10/09
- Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/10
- Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers,
zimoun <=
- Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/10/12
- Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/12
- Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/10/13
- Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/10/13
Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers, zimoun, 2020/10/10
Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/10/12