[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes to the branching workflow
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Changes to the branching workflow |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:17:34 -0500 |
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:34:34PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Ah, there's my blind spot. What kinds of mistakes? When is it harmful to
> push to the open branch?
Mistakes caused by lack of communication about the status of the
branches.
During the recent staging cycle, people kept pushing patches to the
branch after it was frozen.
After the recent staging cycle, before staging-next was renamed to
staging, people pushed changes to a new staging branch, ignoring the
staging-next branch. I had to clean that up.
What do you think? Should we stick with the plan I wrote in the manual?
Or change it?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Changes to the branching workflow, Leo Famulari, 2021/02/11
- Re: Changes to the branching workflow, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2021/02/12
- Re: Changes to the branching workflow, Leo Famulari, 2021/02/12
- Re: Changes to the branching workflow, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2021/02/12
- Re: Changes to the branching workflow,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: Changes to the branching workflow, Andreas Enge, 2021/02/12
- Re: Changes to the branching workflow, Hartmut Goebel, 2021/02/13
- Re: Changes to the branching workflow, Leo Famulari, 2021/02/13
- Re: Changes to the branching workflow, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2021/02/13
Re: Changes to the branching workflow, Hartmut Goebel, 2021/02/13