[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bootstrappable] Re: Can Guile be bootstrapped from source without p
Re: [bootstrappable] Re: Can Guile be bootstrapped from source without psyntax-pp.scm?
Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:25:10 +0100
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
Michael Schierl <firstname.lastname@example.org> skribis:
> Am 15.03.2021 um 18:09 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Woow, this is great news! I think it would be great towards importing
>> it in Guile proper.
>> To do that, I think we should first get Andy’s opinion on the approach.
> I don't think upstream is very interested in having psyntax-pp.scm
> bootstrappable. In Guile 3.0.3 they broke even the `make
> ice-9/psyntax-pp.scm.gen` target, and did not repair it even in Guile
> 3.0.5, that's why I used 3.0.2 for the bootstrap. But I included a patch
> to repair it in 3.0.5 in case you really want to bootstrap that version
> (psyntax-pp.scm has not changed there). OTOH, from the git log it seems
> like psyntax is currently being overhauled for the next release, so
> probably my code would need some updates for the next version.
Andy made it clear that it was a bug. There’s an interest in providing
a good bootstrapping story for Guile; that’s why there’s an interpreter
written in C, for example. I’m sure we’d be happy to address psyntax
bootstrapping as well!
> Also, in the last 15 years I avoided directly contributing to "GNU
> projects" (with FSF as copyright holder in the license headers), reasons
> below. But if anyone else takes my code and upstreams it, I won't object.
Sure, we can discuss the details of how to integrate your code. (Guile
incorporates code not initially written for Guile, such as sxml or
(ice-9 match), and the policy is to not require copyright assignment for
> Regardless, even when not part of Guile, I believe this code is very
> useful for both the live-bootstrap project and Guix to get their Guile
> bootstrapped. And even if nobody ever updates it for 3.0.6+, you can
> always bootstrap the later versions from an earlier Guile. And maybe a
> variation of it lands in GNU Mes, too.
Yes, that would be great. We’ll have to take a closer look, but I’m
under the impression that a fruitful approach for Guile would be to have
it maintained in-tree; that would immediately benefit all distros.
PS: Not all GNU packages require copyright assignment. Guix doesn’t,
for instance, and we’d be happy to get your contributions. :-)