[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages? |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Sep 2021 18:29:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.2 |
> > (define-public sbcl-feeder
> > (name "sbcl-feeder")
> > (version (extended-version
> > (base "1.0.0")
> > (revision 1)
> > (commit "b05f517d7729564575cc809e086c262646a94d34")))
> > (source
> > (origin
> > (method git-fetch)
> > (uri (git-reference ...)
> > (url ...)
> > ;; git-reference needs to be extended to retrieve the commit
> > from the version
> > (version version)))
> > (file-name (git-file-name "feeder" version))
> > (sha256 ...)))
> > [...])
>
> How will this work for SVN and CVS? I am not familiar with either, but
> I know that SVN has its own ‘revision’ thing.
Maybe:
(extended-version
(base-version "14.12.0")
(revision 123) ; what guix considers a revision
(commit 38938)) ; what svn considers a revision (TODO figure out
non-confusing terminology)
(define (version->string v)
(cond ((string? v) v)
;; for SVN
(REVISION is set but COMMIT isn't
(string-append base-version "-" (number->string revision)))
;; for git and mercurial
(both REVISION and COMMIT are set
the code from git-version)))
Or have separate types <git-version>, <mercurial-version>, <svn-version> ...
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, (continued)
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Xinglu Chen, 2021/09/01
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/02
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/02
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Xinglu Chen, 2021/09/03
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/03
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/03
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Xinglu Chen, 2021/09/03
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Leo Famulari, 2021/09/04
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/09/08
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Xinglu Chen, 2021/09/01
- Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?,
Maxime Devos <=
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2021/09/01
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Jonathan McHugh, 2021/09/01
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2021/09/01
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Maxime Devos, 2021/09/02
Re: Can we find a better idiom for unversioned packages?, Jonathan McHugh, 2021/09/02