[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?

From: Hartmut Goebel
Subject: Re: Rethinking propagated inputs?
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 20:01:10 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0

Am 09.09.21 um 11:48 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
We’d have to check how they do it in Nix.  Basically, it’s about
reversing things: currently, everything goes to “out”, and a tiny bit
goes to “lib”.  Here, it’d be the other way around: “out” would contain
only binaries and doc (unless there’s a “doc” output), and “dev” would
contain everything else (headers, pkg-config files, cmake files, section
3 man pages, etc.)


Additionally any static lib (.a) should go into  "lib".

Hartmut Goebel

| Hartmut Goebel          |               |
| | compilers which you thought are impossible |

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]