Re: Code sharing between system and home services (was Re: On the naming of System and Home services modules.)

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Xinglu Chen <public@yoctocell.xyz> skribis:

> I didn’t know about the parent mechanism; that could be an approach to
> take.  But since ‘define-configuration’ is based on (guix records),
> would it make sense to adapt (guix records) to (rnrs records syntactic)
> instead of SRFI-9 records?

Yes, it would make sense (using the lower-level record API, as Maxime
writes), and it’d be useful in other situations as well.

I can take a look if nobody beats me.

Thanks,
Ludo’.