[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Incentives for review
From: |
Joshua Branson |
Subject: |
Re: Incentives for review |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:50:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> A good middle ground may be to provide incentives for review. How?
>> I’m
>> not sure exactly, but first by making it clear that review is makes
>> the
>> project move forward and is invaluable. You once proposed having
>> ‘Reviewed-By’ tags to acknowledge non-committer reviews, and I think
>> that would be one step in that direction. Perhaps there are other
>> things we could do?
>
> I was thinking in the opposite direction: not incentives to recognize
> reviewers but a closer relationship to the patch submitters,
> i.e. “patch buddies” or mentorship. If I made myself officially
> responsible for reviewing commits by Simon and all commits touching R
> then I’m more likely to actually do the review for these patches.
>
> Reviews done by people who are not committers could also be
> acknowledged, of course, but applying the patch (sometimes
> manually because of conflicts) is still manual work that can feel like
> a chore if the committer doesn’t feel a connection to the patch or the
> person who submitted it.
If you're looking for an occassional guix contributor friend to
mentor...I'll gladly volunteer! :)
--
Joshua Branson (jab in #guix)
Sent from Emacs and Gnus
https://gnucode.me
https://video.hardlimit.com/accounts/joshua_branson/video-channels
https://propernaming.org
"You can have whatever you want, as long as you help
enough other people get what they want." - Zig Ziglar
- Re: Tricking peer review, (continued)
- Re: Tricking peer review, zimoun, 2021/10/19
- Re: Tricking peer review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/19
- Re: Tricking peer review, zimoun, 2021/10/19
- Incentives for review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/19
- Re: Incentives for review, zimoun, 2021/10/19
- Re: Incentives for review, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/10/19
- Re: Incentives for review, Christine Lemmer-Webber, 2021/10/19
- Re: Incentives for review,
Joshua Branson <=
- Re: Incentives for review, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/21
- Re: Incentives for review, Thiago Jung Bauermann, 2021/10/20
- Re: Incentives for review, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/10/21
- Re: Incentives for review, zimoun, 2021/10/21
- Re: Incentives for review, Thiago Jung Bauermann, 2021/10/22
- Re: Incentives for review, Artem Chernyak, 2021/10/21
- Re: Incentives for review, Thiago Jung Bauermann, 2021/10/22
- Re: Incentives for review, Kyle Meyer, 2021/10/22
- Re: Incentives for review, Thiago Jung Bauermann, 2021/10/22
- Re: Incentives for review, zimoun, 2021/10/23