Re: Updating mumi on berlin

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi,

Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@kolabnow.com> writes:

[...]

>> (IIRC, I think they're related to the lei tests expecting to be able
>> to kill the lei-daemon process, which isn't the case in Guix's build
>> environment.)
>
> Yes, that's what I'm seeing as well. The lei-daemon process is actually
> killed, but because of bug 30948 it is left in a zombie state and so the
> testsuite thinks that it didn't go away.

> The testsuite checks whether lei-daemon is gone by doing a
> “kill(<lei-daemon pid>, 0)”, which unfortunately succeeds for zombie 
> processes.
>
> I've been meaning to add child reaping to the Guix builder process, but
> I'm moving very slowly due to time constraints and my unfamiliarity with
> that part of Guix...

Yes, that would be the correct and general solution (I hope you get to
fix it, else I may look into it in some time).  Workarounds currently in
use can be seen in our mutter package definition (it's a bit convoluted,
having to fork a process in which we set the child reaping property and
invoke the test suite via tini, acting as a fake PID 1).

HTH,

Maxim