[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Packaging rust-analyzer is not necessary.

From: Maxime Devos
Subject: Re: Packaging rust-analyzer is not necessary.
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 21:06:58 +0200
User-agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1

John Soo schreef op za 26-03-2022 om 09:33 [-0700]:
> > Indeed, e.g. it would be nice to figure out how to eliminate
> > #:skip-
> > build?, replace #:cargo-inputs by regular inputs, figure out how to
> > stop having to package multiple versions of the same package.
> My gut feeling is still that the functional package managers need to
> collaborate with the rust/cargo team. Rust itself just does not lend
> itself well to the model.  It is a shame since we share many of the
> same goals (reproducibility and reliability come to the top of mind).

(responding to an old post)

FWIW, it turns out that Rust actually works well with Guix, only Cargo
doesn't, see reccent threads about antioxidant-build-system.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]