[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-lilypond-mode should we?
|
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
|
Subject: |
Re: emacs-lilypond-mode should we? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:29:34 +0300 |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 02:10:36AM -0500, jgart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should we package this mode separately from lilypond as emacs-lilypond-mode?
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;f=elisp;h=dc4d450a9f98433d04ac87057571ab58f98497c5;hb=HEAD
>
> all best,
>
> jgart
I think it would be best to package it separately, and I'm pretty sure
that's already what is suggested. The two packages I have installed that
happen to have .el files installed also don't have them compiled to .elc
files. Best to keep it separate so it's done with all the automation of
the emacs-build-system.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature