[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dissecting Guix -- blog post series

From: bokr
Subject: Re: Dissecting Guix -- blog post series
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 10:32:50 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)


On +2022-12-09 07:33:16 +0000, ( wrote:
> On Fri Dec 9, 2022 at 7:31 AM GMT, 宋文武 wrote:
> > I think it's missing what "build-derivations" do, or "Part 0: Store".
> Hmm, do you mean adding an example of building a derivation in Scheme with
> ``build-derivations''?  I'll definitiely add that :)
>     -- (

Where is a "What can I trust?" section?

I.e., when some well-meaning enthusiast says,

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
"Can we package the "warm-fuzzy-floss-name" package that they have at";
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

How does a gullible noob like me know what the dangers might be, (e.g. http:)
and how to avoid (most of) them by finding a guix version that has been
gone through with a fine-tooth comb by trusted guix devs and has been
re-hosted at gitlab or, etc ... for added security?

Bengt Richter

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]