[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾
|
From: |
Liliana Marie Prikler |
|
Subject: |
Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2023 06:17:55 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.0 |
Am Sonntag, dem 15.01.2023 um 21:09 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> Hi,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > > We should do better. I mean, it’s just a text editor, isn’t it?
> > Well, gedit is also "just an editor" which weighs 1GB (compared to
> > 880MB for Emacs) in v1.3.0 and 1.3GB in v1.4.0 (mozjs?). I think
> > we ought to look into duplicate references being kept (glibc, gcc),
> > but we can't really work against packages including more inputs
> > without reducing their feature set – in some cases we could try
> > alternatives like mozjs vs. duktape for polkit.
>
> mozjs is already using duktape by default on core-updates, so that
> particular one is solved.
s/mozjs/polkit/, right?
- Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/14
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Akib Azmain Turja, 2023/01/15
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2023/01/15
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/17
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, zimoun, 2023/01/17
- Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾, zimoun, 2023/01/17
- Grandfathering store paths considered harmful (was: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 💾), Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/01/18
- Re: Grandfathering store paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/01/19
- Re: Grandfathering store paths considered harmful, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/01/19